Why owning the end user is profitable – lessons from Axiom and Google
Main Idea
The article discusses the profitability of owning end-user relationships, drawing parallels between Google's dominance in the browser market and Axiom's strategy in the crypto trading space.
Key Points
1. Google maintains browser dominance (~70% market share) through revenue-sharing agreements with Mozilla (Firefox) and payments to OEMs like Samsung and Motorola to preinstall Chrome.
2. Mozilla Foundation derives 85% of its revenue ($570 million) from a deal with Google, highlighting Google's control over browser-based ad revenue.
3. AI-first browsers like Perplexity's Comet aim to challenge Chrome's dominance by reinventing the browser experience and integrating AI into workflows.
4. Axiom remains profitable in the crypto trading space by owning the user interface, regardless of which launchpad (e.g., Pump or LetsBonk) is popular, similar to Google's strategy.
5. Axiom monetizes various launchpads by directing users to their contracts, leveraging its frontend UI dominance in the memecoin trading ecosystem.
Description
The launchpad wars is a win for Axiom regardless
Latest News
- Thursday links: Points, pancakes, DATs and merger arb2025-08-14 22:26:25
- The state of Solana in 6 charts2025-08-14 21:05:39
- Why Circle chose an L1 — and what it means for Ethereum2025-08-14 19:03:33
- Google involved in BTC miner TeraWulf’s ‘standout’ hosting deal2025-08-14 18:09:50
- Solana-compatible Star Atlas L1 plots December launch2025-08-14 17:25:49