Opinion: Tornado Cash developer conviction raises alarm for open-source devs
Main Idea
The conviction of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm under money transmission laws raises concerns about criminal liability for open-source developers, highlighting a perceived double standard in enforcement compared to traditional financial institutions.
Key Points
1. Roman Storm was found guilty under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(C), which treats non-custodial software like Tornado Cash as money transmission, despite FinCEN's 2019 guidance exempting such providers.
2. Legal experts argue the verdict sets a dangerous precedent, criminalizing code publication regardless of intent or control, and reflects an elastic interpretation of jurisdiction by SDNY prosecutors.
3. The DOJ's approach is criticized as hypocritical, contrasting with lenient treatment of major financial institutions in scandals like 1MDB, where Goldman Sachs avoided criminal convictions.
4. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) could clarify that non-custodial developers are not money transmitters, but it offers no retroactive relief for Storm.
5. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce emphasized financial privacy as a fundamental right, opposing SDNY's criminalization of neutral tools like Tornado Cash.
Description
Roman Storm was found guilty in a case experts say criminalizes non-custodial code
Latest News
- Thursday links: Points, pancakes, DATs and merger arb2025-08-14 22:26:25
- The state of Solana in 6 charts2025-08-14 21:05:39
- Why Circle chose an L1 — and what it means for Ethereum2025-08-14 19:03:33
- Google involved in BTC miner TeraWulf’s ‘standout’ hosting deal2025-08-14 18:09:50
- Solana-compatible Star Atlas L1 plots December launch2025-08-14 17:25:49