Investing in crypto is investing in incentives
Main Idea
The article discusses the nature of crypto investments, emphasizing that investors own incentives rather than protocols, and highlights the speculative and opaque nature of valuing crypto projects like Pump.fun and Grass.
Key Points
1. Investors in crypto assets like PUMP and GRASS do not own the underlying protocols but rather the incentives tied to them.
2. Pump.fun's $2 billion cash pile is a focal point for PUMP token holders, but the founders control the funds, raising questions about investor claims.
3. Grass, an AI project, generates undisclosed revenue, making it difficult for analysts to value the project accurately.
4. Maple Finance offers a contrast, with MAPLE token holders having direct voting rights on revenue distribution, resembling traditional ownership.
5. The article suggests that crypto investors often overlook the lack of rights and transparency in many projects, leading to potentially overvalued tokens.
Description
You don’t own the protocol. You own the incentives.
Latest News
- Thursday links: Points, pancakes, DATs and merger arb2025-08-14 22:26:25
- The state of Solana in 6 charts2025-08-14 21:05:39
- Why Circle chose an L1 — and what it means for Ethereum2025-08-14 19:03:33
- Google involved in BTC miner TeraWulf’s ‘standout’ hosting deal2025-08-14 18:09:50
- Solana-compatible Star Atlas L1 plots December launch2025-08-14 17:25:49